Design of advanced control strategies for a multivariable oil heating furnace

Authors

Keywords:

multivariable system; heating furnaces; Smith predictors; temperature control; energy efficiency

Abstract

Introduction: Crude oil refining is an energy-intensive process where heating furnaces are the main fuel consumers, as is the case with furnace F-101 at the Hermanos. Díaz Refinery in Santiago de Cuba. Precise temperature control and operation within optimal ranges improve its dynamics and energy efficiency.

Objective: To design, tune, and rigorously evaluate the performance of different advanced management strategies for the temperature control system in furnace F-101 as a multivariable system, to improve its dynamic behavior and the energy efficiency of the refining process.

Methods: To compare advanced control strategies — proportional integral (absolute error integral method and proportional integral derivative Tuner) and Smith predictors (classic, filtered and modified)— designed through rigorous simulation for temperature control in furnace F-101, modeled as a multivariable 2×2 system based on an experimentally identified model.

Results: Based on the previously identified experimental dynamic model of the crude oil heating furnace, characterized by dominant delays and interactions between variables, five control strategies were evaluated: conventional proportional integral tuned using the absolute error integral method, proportional integral with the proportional integral derivative Tuner tool, classic Smith predictor, filtered Smith predictor (Normey-Rico), and modified Smith predictor (Rivas-Pérez). The latter exhibited the best performance, with a 30% reduction in maximum overshoot, a 42.3% improvement in settling time, and a 45.2% decrease in temperature variability.

Conclusions: This study provides a technical basis for implementing advanced control in this type of furnace, offering the greatest potential for improving energy efficiency and reducing pollutant emissions. This research constitutes the first systematic comparative analysis of control strategies based on Smith predictors for the 2×2 multivariable model experimentally identified for furnace F-101, opening perspectives for the implementation of model predictive control and control strategies with artificial intelligence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Padilla DEC. Relación de la Industria 4.0 con la competitividad industrial. DERROTERO, Revista de la Ciencia y la Investigación. 2021;12(1):272.

2. Alfonso Lopez JJ. Sistema de Refinación en Cuba. Unión Cuba Petróleo (CUPET). Dirección de Refinación. Reporte Interno. Septiembre del 2023.

3. Hu Y, Tan C, Broughton J, Roach PA, Varga L. Nonlinear dynamic simulation and control of large-scale reheating furnace operations using a zone method based model. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2018;135: 41-53. doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.02.022. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359431117374938

4. Dequan S, Guili G, Zhiwei G, Peng X. Application of expert fuzzy PID method for temperature control of heating furnace. Procedia Engineering. 2012;29:257-61. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877705811065404

5. Li G, Ji W, Wei L, Yi Z. A novel fuel supplies scheme based on the retrieval solutions of the decoupled zone method for reheating furnace. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer. 2023;141:1065-72. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735193322006947

6. Benítez-González IO, García-Rodríguez MK, Rosario-Fernández V, Corral-Pozo CM, Rivas-Pérez R. Evaluación de estrategias de control para regular la variación de la temperatura en un horno de la refinería Ñico López. 17 Convención Científica de Ingeniería y Arquitectura; 24-28 nov 2014; La Habana.

7. Rivas-Perez R, Feliu-Batlle V, Castillo-Garcia FJ, Benitez-Gonzalez I. Temperature control of a crude oil preheating furnace using a modified Smith predictor improved with a disturbance rejection term. IFAC Proceedings Volumes. 2014;47(3):5760-5. Disponible en: doi.org/10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.01999; https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0142331219862978

8. Feliu-Batlle V, Rivas-Perez R. Control of the temperature in a petroleum refinery heating furnace based on a robust modified Smith predictor. ISA Transactions. 2021;112:251-70. Disponible en: doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2020.12.006. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405896324020858

9. Jacas Portuondo F, Peña Pupo L, Forgas Brioso MR. Identificación experimental de un Horno Tubular de precalentamiento para futuros análisis de estrategias de control. III Conferencia Internacional de Desarrollo Energético Sostenible CIDES 2023; 16 Nov 2023. Las Villas, Cuba.

10. Aguilar Malavé JS. Control predictivo basado en modelo para un sistema tipo SISO de nivel de líquido representado en variables de estados y su comparación con el control PID y control por redes neuronales artificiales. La Libertad: Universidad Estatal Península de Santa Elena; 2023, Ecuador.

11. Espin J, Castrillon F, Leiva H, Camacho O. A modified Smith predictor based-Sliding mode control approach for integrating processes with dead time. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 2022;61(12):10119-37. Disponible en: doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.03.045. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110016822002204

12. Raja GL, Ali A. Enhanced tuning of Smith predictor-based series cascaded control structure for integrating processes. ISA Transactions. 2021;114:191-205. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019057820305644

13. Mejía C, Camacho O, Chávez D, Herrera M. A modified Smith predictor for processes with variable delay. 2019 IEEE 4th Colombian Conference on Automatic Control (CCAC); october 15-19; Medellin, Colombia.

14. Materán Sánchez M. Eficiencia energética en refinerías de petróleo. enerLAC: Revista de Energía de Latinoamérica y el Caribe. 2018;II(2):72-105. Disponible en: https://enerlac.olade.org/index.php/ENERLAC/article/view/49

15. IEA. Energy Efficiency 2024. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2024. Disponible en: https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-efficiency-2024

16. Zhang R, Cao Z, Li P, Gao F. Design and implementation of an improved linear quadratic regulation control for oxygen content in a coke furnace. IET Control Theory and Applications. 2014;8(14):1303-11. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959152417300951

17. Cantero Abreu NE. Ajuste de controladores en los lazos de control de combustible en los hornos de la Refinería de Cienfuegos S.A. Villa Clara: Universidad Marta Abreu de Las Villas; 2021. Cuba.

18. API. API Standard 560: Fired Heaters for General Refinery Service (5th ed., Includes Addendum 1 and 2). API Publishing Services; 2023.

19. Skogestad S, Postlethwaite I. Multivariable feedback control: analysis and design. 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons; 2024.

20. Haratian M, Amidpour M, Hamidi A. Modeling and optimization of process fired heaters. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2019;157:113722. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.113722. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359431117372277

21. Asensi Martínez D. Study of multivariable control techniques using process simulators and MATLAB/Simulink. Universidad de Alicante, 2024:1-93.

22. Mullinger P, Jenkins B. Industrial and process furnaces: principles, design and operation. Butterworth-Heinemann; 2022.

23. Deshpande PB, Ash RH. Multivariable Process Control. Instrument Society of America; 1989.

24. Dumani Carrillo MA, Benítez Sangurima JL, Plaza D. Diseño del sistema de control de temperatura en un horno de refinería considerando perturbaciones. ESPOL-FIEC; 2022. Disponible en: https//www.dspace.espol.edu.ec/handle/123456789/54278

25. Anitha M, Prusty SB. System Identification and Analysis of Temperature Control System. 2023 International Conference on Advances in Electronics, Communication, Computing and Intelligent Information Systems (ICAECIS); 19-21 Apr 2023. DOI: 10.1109/ICAECIS58353.2023.10170210. Disponible en: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10170210

26. Estremera Toledo E, Lussón Cervantes A, Bausa Ortiz I. Estudio comparativo en sistemas multivariables con retardo: modificaciones del Predictor de Smith y Control Predictivo. Ingeniería Electrónica, Automática y Comunicaciones. 2017;38(2):49-64. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347455295_Compensacion_del_retardo_de_tiempo_en_plantas_multivariables_estables_y_de_fase_no_minima

27. Korupu VL, Muthukumarasamy M. A comparative study of various Smith predictor configurations for industrial delay processes. Chemical Product and Process Modeling. 2022;17(6):701-32. DOI: 10.1515/cppm-2021-0026. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353554559_A_comparative_study_of_various_Smith_predictor_configurations_for_industrial_delay_processes

28. Smith CA. Control automático de procesos: teoría y práctica. 2da ed. México: Limusa; 2014.

29. Ghorbani M, Tavakoli-Kakhki M, Tepljakov A, Petlenkov E. Robust stability analysis of smith predictor based interval fractional-order control systems: A case study in level control process. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica. 2022;10(3):762-80. Disponible en: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9938375

30. EPA. AP-42: Compilation of Air Emissions Factors from Stationary Sources. United States Environmental Protection Agency; 2025. Disponible en: https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-factors-and-quantification/ap-42-compilation-air-emissions-factors-stationary-sources

Published

2026-09-08

How to Cite

Jacas Portuondo, F., Peña Pupo, L., Masip Rodríguez, C. A., & Forgas Brioso, M. R. (2026). Design of advanced control strategies for a multivariable oil heating furnace. Anales De La Academia De Ciencias De Cuba, 16, e3221. Retrieved from https://revistaccuba.sld.cu/index.php/revacc/article/view/3221

Issue

Section

Technical Sciences